I use Netskope for cloud-based security within our organization's multi-cloud environments. It helps with ease of deployment and configuration, enabling us to manage security policies and integrate them with other solutions like identity providers.
I use Netskope for cloud-based security within our organization's multi-cloud environments. It helps with ease of deployment and configuration, enabling us to manage security policies and integrate them with other solutions like identity providers.
Netskope has allowed us to effectively configure security policies and manage them across our environment while providing a secure and efficient solution.
Netskope is highly effective for Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with its inbuilt DLP capabilities. It protects data in the cloud, on the web, and in emails. The threat protection capabilities are beneficial, especially in reducing the load on email traffic by preventing phishing emails and providing malware protection from advanced threats. The easy deployment and configuration of the security policies make it a valuable solution.
A bit of latency is observed in some of the applications. In future updates, I would like to see improvements in latency, as well as enhancements in advanced threat protections. Specifically, the use of AI/ML for anomaly detection and dealing with signatureless advanced threats would be beneficial.
I have been using Netskope for almost a year.
I would rate the stability of Netskope around eight out of ten.
Netskope is highly scalable and has supported our organization's growth without any challenges.
I haven't encountered any major challenges with Netskope's technical support.
I previously worked with Zscaler, but I switched to Netskope due to an organizational change.
The initial setup was smooth and easy. The installation and configuration were seamless, making it straightforward to deploy.
The implementation was a distributed deployment with teams from different regions taking part. So, I can't provide an exact number of people involved.
In terms of cost savings, the solution is effective and comes at a lower cost compared to competitors like Zscaler.
Netskope is cost-effective compared to similar solutions like Zscaler.
I have evaluated both Zscaler and Netskope, and found that both are leading solutions.
I would rate the overall solution eight out of ten. Netskope is easy to deploy, with effective proxy solutions. It plays a critical role in cloud security, especially regarding the SASE framework and zero trust principles.
The solution is useful for remote workflow access.
\nNetskope\u2019s CASB provides good visibility of the applications being used. We can use Shadow IT based on the traffic. DLP and CASB are valuable features. The tool provides extensive DLP features. We can create any level of policies and protect our data on-premise or cloud. The tool integrates with all the components very well.
\nThe threat protection features must be improved. Other competitors on the market, like McAfee and Fortinet, provide threat protection features across all the modules.
\nI have been using the solution for two and a half years.
I rate the stability an eight out of ten.
\nThe tool\u2019s scalability is good. I rate the scalability an eight out of ten. The product is suitable for small and medium-sized businesses.
\nThe support is good, but not up to the mark.
\nNeutral
\nThe product is very easy to deploy. We have to install an agent on the machines through the distribution systems. It is the only dependency. Apart from that, we don't have any internal components on-premises at the user end. Everything is cloud-driven. I rate the ease of setup a ten out of ten. Netskope has its own cloud. We deploy the tool on-premises and on AWS. The product can be deployed for a user within a few minutes. It will take longer to deploy the tool for the whole organization.
\nThe solution provides a very good return on investment. I rate the ROI a ten out of ten.
\nThe pricing is very flexible. I rate the pricing a three out of ten.
\nNetskope is better than Zscaler.
\nWe are users and partners of the solution. I will recommend the solution to others. Overall, I rate the product an eight out of ten.
I use Netskope for cloud-based security within our organization's multi-cloud environments. It helps with ease of deployment and configuration, enabling us to manage security policies and integrate them with other solutions like identity providers.
Netskope has allowed us to effectively configure security policies and manage them across our environment while providing a secure and efficient solution.
Netskope is highly effective for Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with its inbuilt DLP capabilities. It protects data in the cloud, on the web, and in emails. The threat protection capabilities are beneficial, especially in reducing the load on email traffic by preventing phishing emails and providing malware protection from advanced threats. The easy deployment and configuration of the security policies make it a valuable solution.
A bit of latency is observed in some of the applications. In future updates, I would like to see improvements in latency, as well as enhancements in advanced threat protections. Specifically, the use of AI/ML for anomaly detection and dealing with signatureless advanced threats would be beneficial.
I have been using Netskope for almost a year.
I would rate the stability of Netskope around eight out of ten.
Netskope is highly scalable and has supported our organization's growth without any challenges.
I haven't encountered any major challenges with Netskope's technical support.
I previously worked with Zscaler, but I switched to Netskope due to an organizational change.
The initial setup was smooth and easy. The installation and configuration were seamless, making it straightforward to deploy.
The implementation was a distributed deployment with teams from different regions taking part. So, I can't provide an exact number of people involved.
In terms of cost savings, the solution is effective and comes at a lower cost compared to competitors like Zscaler.
Netskope is cost-effective compared to similar solutions like Zscaler.
I have evaluated both Zscaler and Netskope, and found that both are leading solutions.
I would rate the overall solution eight out of ten. Netskope is easy to deploy, with effective proxy solutions. It plays a critical role in cloud security, especially regarding the SASE framework and zero trust principles.
We use the product for cloud application access.
The product's integration with VMware Workspace ONE could be improved. Additionally, they could add endpoint security features similar to Trend Micro.
We have been using the platform for 18 months.
I rate the platform's stability an eight out of ten.
It is a very scalable tool.
The technical support team takes too long to reply for different time zones. We have to give them all the information from the beginning per their protocol every time.
It is a SaaS-based solution and is deployed on the cloud. It is very fast to deploy. We took three months to complete as we had to make many changes to the previous version. I rate the process a seven out of ten.
The product's price is average. We are receiving a competitive offer from Trend Micro Apex One. So, we are evaluating it.
We are evaluating Trend Micro Apex One.
I advise others to make an inventory of all the cloud apps. They should ensure all the shadow IT instances are included in their policies.
I rate the platform an eight out of ten.
My main use cases for Netskope are to provide a secure way for remote access and eliminating traditional VPN, and also to protect the web navigation for the users.
The most helpful features in Netskope are the data loss prevention module, the anti-malware module, and the integration that it has with Information Rights Management from Microsoft.
It has better categorization and more granular features regarding web protection, as it allows me to control HTTP methods. I can publish WhatsApp web for my users as read-only, for example. Other providers cannot; they are only on and off, and do not have the granularity for a website to be read-only.
That comes with a downside, which is that they need to regularly update their controls to support those features in those websites.
In terms of improvements, the possibility to export the dashboards or the data directly to Power BI would be better. The solution has its own data, but you don't get much customization that perhaps you would be able to if you were somehow able to extract the data from an API call and load it into a Power BI dashboard.
I have been working with that tool for three years.
If I were to describe Netskope support, I would say it is above average; it is very good. It's not yet excellent, however, it's very good.
It takes some time to get help as they always try to start from the beginning. There are several steps until I get a qualified, specialized technician. Most of the time, we are fairly IT savvy, so most of the issues we can resolve for ourselves, and when we open a ticket, it's something really complicated, yet we always face level one technicians that try to accomplish the same things that we already did. In those cases, we lose time until we get level two or level three support that helps us go into the situation better.
That's a tricky question regarding the pricing of Netskope. It's quite expensive. That said, if I compare that we did with other solutions, it's somehow justified.
I don't know about Netskope providing any sort of AI features at this time. We haven't gone in that way yet, and I'm not aware. Our company's decision is that we're not going there yet.
I would rate Netskope an eight out of ten.
We use the product for cloud application access.
The product's integration with VMware Workspace ONE could be improved. Additionally, they could add endpoint security features similar to Trend Micro.
We have been using the platform for 18 months.
I rate the platform's stability an eight out of ten.
It is a very scalable tool.
The technical support team takes too long to reply for different time zones. We have to give them all the information from the beginning per their protocol every time.
It is a SaaS-based solution and is deployed on the cloud. It is very fast to deploy. We took three months to complete as we had to make many changes to the previous version. I rate the process a seven out of ten.
The product's price is average. We are receiving a competitive offer from Trend Micro Apex One. So, we are evaluating it.
We are evaluating Trend Micro Apex One.
I advise others to make an inventory of all the cloud apps. They should ensure all the shadow IT instances are included in their policies.
I rate the platform an eight out of ten.